| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: deadlock with latest xfs |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:28:30 +1100 |
| Cc: | Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20081023205727.GA28490@infradead.org> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4900412A.2050802@sgi.com> <20081023205727.GA28490@infradead.org> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 04:57:28PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 07:17:30PM +1000, Lachlan McIlroy wrote: > > another problem with latest xfs > > Is this with the 2.6.27-based ptools/cvs tree or with the 2.6.28 based > git tree? It does looks more like a VM issue than a XFS issue to me. I hit this immediately after I upgraded to a 2.6.28 base tree from a 2.6.27-rc9. I couldn't get to the bottom of it - it did look like a lost I/O or VM lockup but I haven't seen it since so I haven't been able to do anything more.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: assertion failure with latest xfs, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | XFS performance tracking and regression monitoring, Mark Goodwin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: deadlock with latest xfs, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: deadlock with latest xfs, Lachlan McIlroy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |