Re: assertion failure with latest xfs

[Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 07:08:15PM +1000, Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
> Just encountered this after pulling in the latest changes.  We are trying to
> initialise an inode that should have an i_count of 1 but instead it is 2.  I
> was running XFSQA test 167 when it happened.

I think the assert is incorrect.  The inode has been added to the radix
tree in xfs_iget_cache_miss, and starting from that point an igrab can
kick in from the sync code and bump the refcount.