On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 07:31:07PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 04:26:16PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 02:46:57AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > Always use the generic xfs_btree_block type instead of the short / long
> > > structures. Add XFS_BTREE_SBLOCK_LEN / XFS_BTREE_LBLOCK_LEN defines for
> > > the length of a short / long form block. The rationale for this is that
> > > we will grow more btree block header variants to support CRCs and other
> > > RAS information, and always accessing them through the same datatype
> > > with unions for the short / long form pointers makes implementing this
> > > much easier.
> > .......
> > > @@ -382,16 +382,16 @@ xfs_alloc_fixup_trees(
> > > }
> > > #ifdef DEBUG
> > > {
> > > - xfs_alloc_block_t *bnoblock;
> > > - xfs_alloc_block_t *cntblock;
> > > + struct xfs_btree_block *bnoblock;
> > > + struct xfs_btree_block *cntblock;
> >
> > Only need one tab there?
>
> I think this was aligning to something, but I don't really care.
>
> > > - bnoblock = XFS_BUF_TO_ALLOC_BLOCK(bno_cur->bc_bufs[0]);
> > > - cntblock = XFS_BUF_TO_ALLOC_BLOCK(cnt_cur->bc_bufs[0]);
> > > XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_RETURN(
> > > - be16_to_cpu(bnoblock->bb_numrecs) ==
> > > - be16_to_cpu(cntblock->bb_numrecs));
> > > + bnoblock->bb_numrecs ==
> > > + cntblock->bb_numrecs);
> >
> > The comparison could probably be made one line....
>
> That would be far over 80 characters.
I meant:
XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_RETURN(
bnoblock->bb_numrecs == cntblock->bb_numrecs);
Which doesn't go over 80 chars.
Doesn't really matter, though.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
|