| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2/6] XFS: mark inodes for reclaim via a tag in the inode radix tree |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 16 Sep 2008 14:26:49 +1000 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20080915211425.GF29743@infradead.org> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <1221315300-30336-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1221315300-30336-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <20080915211425.GF29743@infradead.org> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 05:14:26PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 12:14:56AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > Prepare for removing the deleted inode list by marking inodes > > for reclaim in the inode radix trees so that we can use the > > radix trees to find reclaimable inodes. > > Any reason this is split from patch 4 in the series? Looks good > otherwise. Yeah - so I can test each change as I write it. Adding the tag didn't cause any problems, changing to traverse based on the tag didn't cause any problems, removing the old list didn't cause any problems. i.e. the patches are small, easily verifiable steps. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/3] XFS: Make use of the init-once slab optimisation., Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 3/6] XFS: rename inode reclaim functions, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2/6] XFS: mark inodes for reclaim via a tag in the inode radix tree, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 4/6] XFS: use the inode radix tree for reclaiming inodes, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |