| To: | Bhagi rathi <jahnu77@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: TAKE 981498 - Use KM_NOFS for debug trace buffers |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 7 Aug 2008 06:19:57 +1000 |
| Cc: | Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <cc7060690808061012x43511581m15c794e72129becc@mail.gmail.com> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Bhagi rathi <jahnu77@xxxxxxxxx>, Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <20080806061553.A8D8958C52A4@chook.melbourne.sgi.com> <cc7060690808061012x43511581m15c794e72129becc@mail.gmail.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 10:42:15PM +0530, Bhagi rathi wrote: > I couldn't get a chance to read the diff's completely. If I click on > Lachlan's url for diff's, I couldn't access them. It looks to me that > the issue is not just with trace buffers. It can extend to xfs_iformat > as well. The same dead-lock can spring via > > xfs_iread -> xfs_iformat -> xfs_iformat_extents -> xfs_iext_add -> > xfs_iext_inline_to_direct -> which can do kmem_alloc with > KM_SLEEP flag. Fixed already: Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Previous by Date: | Re: TAKE 981498 - Use KM_NOFS for debug trace buffers, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: TAKE 981498 - use KM_MAYFAIL in xfs_mountfs, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: TAKE 981498 - Use KM_NOFS for debug trace buffers, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: TAKE 981498 - Use KM_NOFS for debug trace buffers, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |