| To: | Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [rfc][patch 3/3] xfs: use new vmap API |
| From: | Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 5 Aug 2008 04:05:39 +0200 |
| Cc: | Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4897B05A.7040002@sgi.com> |
| References: | <20080728123438.GA13926@wotan.suse.de> <20080728123703.GC13926@wotan.suse.de> <4896A197.3090004@sgi.com> <200808042057.20607.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> <4897B05A.7040002@sgi.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.9i |
Assuming patch 1 gets merged upstream, I think Andrew would normally send off 2 and 3 to the XFS maintainers at that point (ie. when its prerequisites are upstream) for you to merge. On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 11:43:54AM +1000, Lachlan McIlroy wrote: > Okay. When the time comes will you push the XFS changes to mainline > or would you like us to? > > Nick Piggin wrote: > >Thanks for taking a look. I'll send them over to -mm with patch 1, > >then, for some testing. > > > >On Monday 04 August 2008 16:28, Lachlan McIlroy wrote: > >>Looks good to me. > >> > >>Nick Piggin wrote: > >>>Implement XFS's large buffer support with the new vmap APIs. See the vmap > >>>rewrite patch for some numbers. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 24/26] implement generic xfs_btree_getrec, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 26/26] add rec_len and key_len fields to struct xfs_btree_ops, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [rfc][patch 3/3] xfs: use new vmap API, Lachlan McIlroy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Corruption of in-memory data detected - on heavy hard linking, Christian Affolter |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |