| To: | Mark Goodwin <markgw@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs leaking? |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:13:03 -0400 |
| Cc: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <487AD102.9020306@sgi.com> |
| References: | <4877928A.1020008@sandeen.net> <20080711233832.GH11558@disturbed> <4877FC4F.7020906@sandeen.net> <487810BE.5050701@sandeen.net> <487AD102.9020306@sgi.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 02:07:30PM +1000, Mark Goodwin wrote: > > > Eric Sandeen wrote: >> >> 2.6.26-rc9 passed without incident. > > So what is the conclusion here? Because you just down-rev? Or do we have > an intermittent leak of some kind? The symptoms in the first post look like an inode leak, which is more likely to be in common code than in XFS. I'd expect -rc9 just fixed it or Eric didn't manage to hit it as easily. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs leaking?, Mark Goodwin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs leaking?, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs leaking?, Mark Goodwin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs leaking?, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |