| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: md raid1 passes barriers, but xfs doesn't use them? |
| From: | Martin Steigerwald <Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:25:17 +0200 |
| Cc: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <4860F7E4.2080106@sandeen.net> |
| References: | <48605A8E.9070903@sandeen.net> <200806241131.12112.Martin@lichtvoll.de> <4860F7E4.2080106@sandeen.net> (sfid-20080624_161808_555876_E63DCB9F) |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.9.9 |
Am Dienstag 24 Juni 2008 schrieb Eric Sandeen: > Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > Hi Eric! [...] > > Did you test with ext3 too? > > This is xfs-specific; ext3 does not look for the queue ordered flag so > won't have this problem on md raid1. > > > [1] http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9554 > > but that's for device-mapper, which has never supported barriers .... > I'm talking about md raid1 here (not dm). Thanks for the info. My misunderstanding - I always thought and I thought I even read it somewhere - that md was a device mapper application. Ciao, -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: md raid1 passes barriers, but xfs doesn't use them?, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | PERKENALAN : 'Sakura Florist" = menerima pesanan khusus bunga papan, Bunga Papan untuk Ucapan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: md raid1 passes barriers, but xfs doesn't use them?, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: md raid1 passes barriers, but xfs doesn't use them?, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |