| To: | Lance Reed <lreed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Probems with xfs_repair on large filesystem and 32bit OS. |
| From: | "'hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 10 Jun 2008 09:01:46 -0400 |
| Cc: | "'hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx'" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <6A32BC807C106440B7E23208F280DDAF01D3FC9317@bcmail1.VIDMARK.LOCAL> |
| References: | <6A32BC807C106440B7E23208F280DDAF01D3FC9317@bcmail1.VIDMARK.LOCAL> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) |
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 08:50:30AM -0400, Lance Reed wrote: > Thanks! > > Yes the log died and was zeroed already with xfs_repair already. > > So I plan to put a 64bit head on the volumes and leave it that way. > > I asuume I need to still keep it under 16 tb since the fs datastuctures are > 32bit? > All XFS data structures (which matter for this) are 64bit. But the pagecache size in 32bit x86 systems is indeeed limited, so a larger filesystem won't work there. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Probems with xfs_repair on large filesystem and 32bit OS., Lance Reed |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Filesystem article up, thank you all!, Thomas King |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Probems with xfs_repair on large filesystem and 32bit OS., Lance Reed |
| Next by Thread: | Filesystem article up, thank you all!, Thomas King |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |