xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [patch] xfsqa test to check log size scaling

To: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [patch] xfsqa test to check log size scaling
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 00:59:13 -0400
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-dev <xfs-dev@xxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20080522221252.GV173056135@sgi.com>
References: <20080522061257.GR173056135@sgi.com> <20080522132542.GC4972@infradead.org> <20080522221252.GV173056135@sgi.com>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 08:12:52AM +1000, David Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 09:25:42AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 04:12:57PM +1000, David Chinner wrote:
> > > XFS-QA test to check that log size scaling works correctly
> > > for old and new maximum log sizes.
> > 
> > Am I missing somethign or would this fail if the partitions used for
> > xfsqa are smaller than 256GB?  I don't even have that much total storage
> > on my laptop :)
> 
> Uses loop devices and sparse files - should work just fine on any partition a
> bit over 2GB (the log gets zeroed during mkfs). I know it passses on a 14GB
> scratch filesystem....

Okay for the patch then.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>