| To: | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS/md/blkdev warning (was Re: Linux 2.6.26-rc2) |
| From: | Alistair John Strachan <alistair@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 18 May 2008 00:12:04 +0100 |
| Cc: | Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805171411250.3020@woody.linux-foundation.org> |
| References: | <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805120731480.3188@woody.linux-foundation.org> <200805172109.59244.alistair@devzero.co.uk> <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805171411250.3020@woody.linux-foundation.org> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.9.9 |
On Saturday 17 May 2008 22:17:37 Linus Torvalds wrote: [snip] > Jens, there's been a *lot* of breakage in the block layer. The DMA bounce > buffer crap, and this looks like the atomic bit setting was broken too. > > Alistair, does the problem go away if you revert both the patch from Neil > and the original patch that caused the need for that patch to begin with > (ie commit 75ad23bc0fcb4f992a5d06982bf0857ab1738e9e "block: make queue > flags non-atomic"). I did a git revert on this and manually fixed up the conflicts; I also reverted Neil's patch. Unfortunately (though the WARNING is still gone) it doesn't fix the hang. > Jens, Nick, I think that whole series just needs to be undone. > > Linus -- Cheers, Alistair. 137/1 Warrender Park Road, Edinburgh, UK. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS/md/blkdev warning (was Re: Linux 2.6.26-rc2), Linus Torvalds |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Regression- XFS won't mount on partitioned md array, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS/md/blkdev warning (was Re: Linux 2.6.26-rc2), Linus Torvalds |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS/md/blkdev warning (was Re: Linux 2.6.26-rc2), Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |