| To: | Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 3/4] XFS: Return case-insensitive match for dentry cache |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 15 May 2008 10:11:21 -0400 |
| Cc: | Barry Naujok <bnaujok@xxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <DCB15FFF-F942-47BD-B8FB-38AADC24B9D6@cam.ac.uk> |
| References: | <20080513075749.477238845@chook.melbourne.sgi.com> <20080513080152.911303131@chook.melbourne.sgi.com> <20080513085724.GC21919@infradead.org> <op.ua4wa7t03jf8g2@pc-bnaujok.melbourne.sgi.com> <20080515045700.GA4328@infradead.org> <op.ua6ji4r93jf8g2@pc-bnaujok.melbourne.sgi.com> <DCB15FFF-F942-47BD-B8FB-38AADC24B9D6@cam.ac.uk> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) |
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 02:43:44PM +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > Yes, and you can get the performance back if you allow negative dentries to > be created. You just have to make sure that every time a directory entry > is created in directory X, all negative dentries which are children of > directory X are thrown away. We might even be able to optimize this a little by calling d_compare on each alias to see if it hashes down to the same one down in the fs. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 3/4] XFS: Return case-insensitive match for dentry cache, Anton Altaparmakov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] fix memory corruption with small buffer reads, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 3/4] XFS: Return case-insensitive match for dentry cache, Anton Altaparmakov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 3/4] XFS: Return case-insensitive match for dentry cache, Barry Naujok |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |