| To: | Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: reduce stack usage in xfs_bmap_btalloc() |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 28 Apr 2008 01:56:29 -0400 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1209341212.23166.122.camel@edge.scott.net.au> |
| References: | <200804261651.02078.vda.linux__2040.04651536724$1209223026$gmane$org@googlemail.com> <87iqy4wfjq.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <20080426200701.GA10883@infradead.org> <20080426202630.GG17905@one.firstfloor.org> <20080426202323.GA14245@infradead.org> <1209341212.23166.122.camel@edge.scott.net.au> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) |
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 10:06:51AM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote: > Having to compile chunks of XFS code in both kernel and > userspace is also wierd (relative to other drivers), and > its a side-effect of needing to do that (all the code > dealing with specifics of ondisk format is shared). There would be neater ways to deal with that, but then again there are more urgent things to tackle. And for the time beeing using STATIC to imply non-inline is actually a very useful hack for XFS. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch] xfsqa - 008 is unreliable on 64k page size, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: REVIEW: 980021 - fix up noattr2 mount option, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: reduce stack usage in xfs_bmap_btalloc(), Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: reduce stack usage in xfs_bmap_btalloc(), Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |