Re: [patch] xfsqa - 008 is unreliable on 64k page size

xfs

Re: [patch] xfsqa - 008 is unreliable on 64k page size

To:	David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [patch] xfsqa - 008 is unreliable on 64k page size
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 28 Apr 2008 01:55:11 -0400
Cc:	xfs-dev <xfs-dev@xxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to:	<20080408013833.GN108924158@sgi.com>
References:	<20080408013833.GN108924158@sgi.com>
Sender:	xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 11:38:33AM +1000, David Chinner wrote:
> Test 008 is unreliable on 64k page size. The I/O size is large
> enough that the probability of extent merging results in intermittent
> failures due to fewer extents that the +/- 10% tolerance allows.

Looks good.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[patch] xfsqa - 008 is unreliable on 64k page size, David Chinner Re: [patch] xfsqa - 008 is unreliable on 64k page size, David Chinner Re: [patch] xfsqa - 008 is unreliable on 64k page size, David Chinner Re: [patch] xfsqa - 008 is unreliable on 64k page size, Christoph Hellwig <=

Previous by Date:	TAKE 980887 - remove xfs_log_ticket_zone on rmmod, David Chinner
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH] xfs: reduce stack usage in xfs_bmap_btalloc(), Christoph Hellwig
Previous by Thread:	Re: [patch] xfsqa - 008 is unreliable on 64k page size, David Chinner
Next by Thread:	[patch] xfsqa 185 - remove uninitialised variables in golden output., David Chinner
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]