| To: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: reduce stack usage in xfs_bmap_btalloc() |
| From: | Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 28 Apr 2008 01:57:12 +0200 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=3zG05DkgIWiT8Ggo7/E5FJZh4SDd4fTlTWu4bmBWyDE=; b=MALz7Yf5K1fJf2nezIKdHN6L3AIX4u1HZI/6VnOHwrpI/lsPdNtlBn9Bih2EfNjpRb+JMTf7QrRF5BE+29YKhgImKSiteXqDSjWISgqGu9kbrGUMfo+jHitl56BCLo6wl7cbB4mtjDGc1QW0nGLpAWlFyxEE55LLwpG8cq7/bw0= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=C+7Xz7vBKxyPuU7WEMe9vHbr9lwp1/At0RE4Ysl0pU0vLEIUbPW2h9+vZTj34quhZ536hUl6g1+H/Idu22oQ58o603RAT0UQ4K2Oo4OqBVRQW52S8hT9EqmNgMHqyvkESRViXszR0v+hgeSKTB/hvr2DcXFYMxJwiRljHcf/2G4= |
| In-reply-to: | <20080427234056.GA108924158@sgi.com> |
| References: | <200804261651.02078.vda.linux@googlemail.com> <20080427234056.GA108924158@sgi.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.8.2 |
On Monday 28 April 2008 01:40, David Chinner wrote: > On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 04:51:02PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > > Hi David, > > > > This patch reduces xfs_bmap_btalloc() stack usage by 50 bytes > > by moving part of its body into a helper function. > > Can you please attach your patches inline, Denys (see > Documentation/SubmittingPatches)? I can, but Kmail is notorious for mangling them :( Is it ok if I will paste them inline AND attach them too, so that you get guaranteed-nonmangled one in attachment? > I have a set of patches that introduces new functionality into the > allocator (dynamic allocation policies) that reduces > xfs_bmap_btalloc() function by 36 bytes (just by chance, I didn't > design it for this purpose). It breaks it down on functional > boundaries like Christoph's patch. I'm going to revist that patch > w.r.t both these patches and see what falls out the bottom... Nice to know that. Can you point me to svn/CVS/git/whatever which holds latest xfs devel tree? -- vda |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: reduce stack usage in xfs_page_state_convert(), Denys Vlasenko |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: reduce stack usage in xfs_bmap_btalloc(), Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: reduce stack usage in xfs_bmap_btalloc(), David Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: reduce stack usage in xfs_bmap_btalloc(), David Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |