Re: linux-next: Tree for April 24

To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: linux-next: Tree for April 24
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:44:57 -0400
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0804242136420.21224@anakin>
References:	<20080424173626.bcd088e7.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0804242136420.21224@anakin>
Sender:	xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 09:40:15PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Status of my local build tests will be at
> > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/linux-next.  If maintainers want to give
> > advice about cross compilers/configs that work, we are always open to add
> > more builds.
> 
> For the second day in a row, m68k builds failed because of
> 
>     fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c:527: error: implicit declaration of function 
> 'xfs_icsb_sync_counters_locked'
>     make[3]: *** [fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.o] Error 1

Eric already submitted a patch on the xfs list, that should make it to
the tree ASAP.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 24, Geert Uytterhoeven Re: linux-next: Tree for April 24, Christoph Hellwig <=

Previous by Date:	Re: linux-next: Tree for April 24, Geert Uytterhoeven
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH] fix non-smp xfs build, Christoph Hellwig
Previous by Thread:	Re: linux-next: Tree for April 24, Geert Uytterhoeven
Next by Thread:	Aerotek, Bracy, Caron
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]