| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [REVIEW] Remove unused HAVE_SPLICE macro |
| From: | donaldd@xxxxxxx (Donald Douwsma) |
| Date: | Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:28:32 +1000 |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | nail 11.25 7/29/05 |
Still more 2.4 build remnants to get rid of... HAVE_SPLICE was part of the infrastructure for building 2.4 and 2.6 kernels out of the same tree. Now we don't build 2.4 kernels this way anymore its unused. Signed-off-by: Donald Douwsma <donaldd@xxxxxxx> --- a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_linux.h 2008-04-08 13:23:55.000000000 +1000 +++ b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_linux.h 2008-04-08 12:09:22.455341741 +1000 @@ -99,7 +99,6 @@ /* * Feature macros (disable/enable) */ -#define HAVE_SPLICE /* a splice(2) exists in 2.6, but not in 2.4 */ #ifdef CONFIG_SMP #define HAVE_PERCPU_SB /* per cpu superblock counters are a 2.6 feature */ #else |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] simplify xfs_lock_for_rename, Barry Naujok |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] simplify xfs_lock_for_rename, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | [patch] xfsqa - 166 - fix filter for stripe aligned filesystems, David Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [REVIEW] Remove unused HAVE_SPLICE macro, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |