| To: | Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Serious XFS crash |
| From: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 3 Apr 2008 10:49:34 +1000 |
| Cc: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20080403002248.4bd263e6@galadriel.home> |
| References: | <20080325185453.3a1957dd@galadriel.home> <20080325233611.GW103491721@sgi.com> <20080401140035.46470306@galadriel.home> <20080402055831.GG103491721@sgi.com> <20080402133003.4bb043e4@galadriel.home> <20080402220750.GJ103491721@sgi.com> <20080403002248.4bd263e6@galadriel.home> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 12:22:48AM +0200, Emmanuel Florac wrote: > Le Thu, 3 Apr 2008 08:07:50 +1000 vous écriviez: > > > I'd go and find whatever disk is located at LBA 0xE6DCA-0xE6E2A and > > replace it - if there are that many repairs needed on it, it's likely > > to be failing.... > > > > Oh, it failed and I changed it. However it's a RAID-5 and though it > appeared corrected, as you've seen the XFS fs crashed for no apparent > reason (there was little or no activity at the time of the march 23rd > crash) later. I was wondering if it could be related, for instance if > some garbage may have remained hidden somewhere and break it later, > like a standing nail waiting for someone to step on it... Yes, entirely possible. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/7] XFS: ASCII case-insensitive support, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH V2] combined features2 fixup patches (updating/rewriting what was sent in other threads), Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Serious XFS crash, Emmanuel Florac |
| Next by Thread: | [RFC PATCH 0/3] freeze feature ver 1.1, Takashi Sato |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |