| To: | Jan Derfinak <ja@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Differences in mkfs.xfs and xfs_info output. |
| From: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:20:59 +1100 |
| Cc: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.63.0802190044350.8907@alienAngel.home.sk> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.63.0802160149590.4592@alienAngel.home.sk> <20080216074019.GV155407@sgi.com> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0802162319300.6528@alienAngel.home.sk> <20080217230645.GY155407@sgi.com> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0802180015110.4514@alienAngel.home.sk> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0802190044350.8907@alienAngel.home.sk> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 01:04:35AM +0100, Jan Derfinak wrote: > On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Jan Derfinak wrote: > > > > with dd and rm'ing a subset of the files before unmounting? > > > I've run some simple tests this morning that do this, and I > > > don't see any issues. I'd like to confirm that simple cases > > > > Did you use x86_64 and latest CVS kernel? > > I have run the mount,umount test on x86 architecture with the same kernel > source version. Kernel image is of course different, it is different > computer. > On x86 everything is ok. > I guess that problem is in 64-bit architecture. Is it possible? The output I showed you was from an ia64 machine, so it's not purely 64bit related. Can you rebuild you x86_64 kernel from the same kernel tree you built the ia32 (make mrproper; make ....) and reinstall it and see if the still exists? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Differences in mkfs.xfs and xfs_info output., Jan Derfinak |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: tuning, many small files, small blocksize, Timothy Shimmin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Differences in mkfs.xfs and xfs_info output., Jan Derfinak |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Differences in mkfs.xfs and xfs_info output., Jan Derfinak |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |