xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH, RFC] use generic ACL code

To: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] use generic ACL code
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 08:19:39 +0100
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, a.gruenbacher@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <47B3C701.6090409@sgi.com>
References: <20080207083222.GA14317@lst.de> <47B3C701.6090409@sgi.com>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 03:43:45PM +1100, Timothy Shimmin wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
> 
> Been going thru some v4 acl code but a couple of comments:
> 
> (1) it looks like you decided that an xfs_iget_acl and xfs_iset_acl
> (basing on the ext3 code of Andreas)
> are not worth it and you'd prefer to do the code directly.

I was actually looking at jfs because I was involved with the creation
of that code and it seemed a tad cleaner than ext2/ext3.  I'm not
sure we want the helpers, but we might need the locking in there.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>