| To: | Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH, RFC] use generic ACL code |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 16 Feb 2008 08:19:39 +0100 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, a.gruenbacher@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <47B3C701.6090409@sgi.com> |
| References: | <20080207083222.GA14317@lst.de> <47B3C701.6090409@sgi.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 03:43:45PM +1100, Timothy Shimmin wrote: > Hi Christoph, > > Been going thru some v4 acl code but a couple of comments: > > (1) it looks like you decided that an xfs_iget_acl and xfs_iset_acl > (basing on the ext3 code of Andreas) > are not worth it and you'd prefer to do the code directly. I was actually looking at jfs because I was involved with the creation of that code and it seemed a tad cleaner than ext2/ext3. I'm not sure we want the helpers, but we might need the locking in there. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: rewrite very slow, DS |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Differences in mkfs.xfs and xfs_info output., David Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH, RFC] use generic ACL code, Timothy Shimmin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH, RFC] use generic ACL code, Andreas Gruenbacher |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |