| To: | "Felix E. Klee" <felix.klee@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Restoring damaged incremental XFS dump? |
| From: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:24:46 +1100 |
| Cc: | Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1202815035.5821.1236404891@webmail.messagingengine.com> |
| References: | <1202769551.16458.1236311973@webmail.messagingengine.com> <47B0E26D.7070807@sgi.com> <1202815035.5821.1236404891@webmail.messagingengine.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:17:15PM +0100, Felix E. Klee wrote: > On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:03:57 +1100, "Timothy Shimmin" > <tes@xxxxxxx> said: > > I'm not sure what you mean by "true snapshots". I wouldn't really > > call it snapshots as in what you could get if you froze the > > filesystem etc.. > > Oh, it does not freeze the filesystem - what a pity. I recall someone > telling me that it does. Seems like that was bad information or my > memory is failing on me. Use dm-snap to create a snapshot and do the backup from that. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: inode size benchmarking, David Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: inode size benchmarking, Christian Røsnes |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Restoring damaged incremental XFS dump?, Felix E. Klee |
| Next by Thread: | xfs [_fsr] probs in 2.6.24.0, Linda Walsh |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |