| To: | David Sparks <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: mkfs.xfs ... lazy-count=1 ... not mountable by older kernels? |
| From: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:15:55 +1100 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <475EE83A.3060607@ca.sophos.com> |
| References: | <475EE83A.3060607@ca.sophos.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 11:42:50AM -0800, David Sparks wrote: > Hi all, > > Is it expected that filesystems made with lazy-count=1 are not mountable by > older kernels? That is expected. lazy-count is a mkfs option because it changes the on-disk format slightly, and older kernels do not understand that format. Hence mkfs sets a superblock feature bit to prevent the filesystem from being mounted on kernels that don't understand the slightly different disk format. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | mkfs.xfs ... lazy-count=1 ... not mountable by older kernels?, David Sparks |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS internal error xfs_btree_check_sblock, David Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | mkfs.xfs ... lazy-count=1 ... not mountable by older kernels?, David Sparks |
| Next by Thread: | Re: mkfs.xfs ... lazy-count=1 ... not mountable by older kernels?, Timothy Shimmin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |