| To: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH,RFC] Factor some btree code.... |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:20:06 +0000 |
| Cc: | xfs-dev <xfs-dev@xxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20071106091836.GV995458@sgi.com> |
| References: | <20071106091836.GV995458@sgi.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
I like this. But I think a single set of xfs_btree_ops would be a lot more readable. Also I'm not sure we actually need all these ops, e.g. instead of .buf_to_block we could always just call XFS_BUF_PTR directly. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] bulkstat fixups, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Turn off XBF_READ_AHEAD in io completion, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH,RFC] Factor some btree code...., David Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH,RFC] Factor some btree code...., David Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |