| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Default mount options (that suck less). |
| From: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 29 Oct 2007 08:44:56 -0700 |
| Cc: | Niv Sardi <xaiki@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4725FBB4.1010400@sandeen.net> |
| References: | <20071029075657.GA84369978@melbourne.sgi.com> <4725FBB4.1010400@sandeen.net> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 10:26:44AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > What would you think of a mkfs conf file like e2fsprogs has, which > defines filesystem classes, and defaults for each? (small, news, > largefile, etc...) That makes more sense for ext2/3 where some meta-data isn't dynamically allocated as needed, for example, historically nntp servers used one file per article and would often run out of inodes. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Default mount options (that suck less)., Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Default mount options (that suck less)., Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Default mount options (that suck less)., Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Default mount options (that suck less)., Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |