xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.24-rc1

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.24-rc1
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:50:34 -0700
Cc: tes@xxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20071017203658.GA22073@infradead.org>
References: <20071017110339.D4B3158C38F1@chook.melbourne.sgi.com> <20071017203658.GA22073@infradead.org>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:36:58 +0100
Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 09:03:39PM +1000, Tim Shimmin wrote:
> > Hi Linus,
> > 
> > Please pull from the for-linus branch:
> >     git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git for-linus
> > 
> > These include changes we have had scheduled for 2.6.24.
> > In particular they include Christoph's (hch's) behavior removal patches.
> 
> Can you please send my '[PATCH] cleanup fid types mess' to Linus aswell?
> I have a stack of 15 patches reworking the nfs exporting code waiting
> in -mm to get in in this merge window that depend on this cleanup to
> free struct fid for generic useage.
> 
> Also getting the makefile cleanup into mainline to reduce spurious difference
> would help a lot.

argh, -mm's *new-export*.patch has a dependency upon git-xfs's
ef6567a363c5f301c0bc885068d93cd9b3c05cc9.  I never knew that, but I would
have found out later today...

Tim, if you want I can just steal that diff out of the xfs tree and send it
in separately.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>