| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: mkfs options for a 16x hw raid5 and xfs (mostly large files) |
| From: | Ralf Gross <Ralf-Lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:15:34 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <1254510454-1190819012-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1744849406-@bxe108.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709260549250.4769@p34.internal.lan> <1254510454-1190819012-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1744849406-@bxe108.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.9i |
Bryan J Smith schrieb: > Everyone can play local benchmarking games all they want, > and software RAID will almost always be faster, significantly at times. > > What matters is actual, multiple client performance under full load. > Anything less is a completely irrelevant. You're right, but these benchmarks help to find simple failures or misconfigurations at an earlier stage of the process. Ralf |
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS DMAPI support for RHEL4, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS DMAPI support for RHEL4, Russell Cattelan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: mkfs options for a 16x hw raid5 and xfs (mostly large files), Bryan J Smith |
| Next by Thread: | Re: mkfs options for a 16x hw raid5 and xfs (mostly large files), Bryan J. Smith |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |