| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 5/4] simplify xfs_create/mknod/symlink prototype |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 15 Sep 2007 00:05:20 +0200 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <46EAD432.1030704@sandeen.net> |
| References: | <20070914163041.GG7110@lst.de> <46EAD364.7060305@sandeen.net> <46EAD432.1030704@sandeen.net> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 01:34:26PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > -xfs_symlink [xfs]: 240 > > +xfs_symlink [xfs]: 256 > > Although, that one is a little unfortunate ;) and rather odd. 16 bytes more stack for passing in a 32bit scalar instead of a 32/64bit pointer, huh? Then again we could just kill that parameter because symlinks always get the same mode.. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Newbie question about xfs_db with the response message "unexpected XFS SB magic number 0x2e524d46", Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 5/4] simplify xfs_create/mknod/symlink prototype, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 5/4] simplify xfs_create/mknod/symlink prototype, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 5/4] simplify xfs_create/mknod/symlink prototype, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |