| To: | Bhagi rathi <jahnu77@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] kill BMAPI_UNWRITTEN |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 10 Sep 2007 14:02:07 +0200 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <cc7060690709091234r115e793p9cc491104862a5cd@mail.gmail.com> |
| References: | <20070909154103.GB19986@lst.de> <cc7060690709091234r115e793p9cc491104862a5cd@mail.gmail.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 01:04:55AM +0530, Bhagi rathi wrote: > The reason for eliminating BMAPI_UNWRITTEN is not clear. It is ideal to keep > all the block map > interfaces and information to go through xfs_iomap, xfs_bmapi functionality. Despit it's name xfs_iomap_write_unwritten is not a block map interface. Just take a look at the code, it does not use the block allocator data structures at all, and it does not do the central xfs_bmapi call (it uses xfs_bmapi later on but in very different ways). |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] kill BMAPI_DEVICE, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | getfattr and symlinks, Zdenek Prikryl |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] kill BMAPI_UNWRITTEN, Bhagi rathi |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] remove dead SYNC_BDFLUSH case in xfs_sync_inodes, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |