| To: | Just Marc <marc@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs_fsr, performance related tweaks |
| From: | Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 29 Jun 2007 10:13:57 +0200 |
| Cc: | nscott@xxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4684A728.1050405@corky.net> |
| References: | <4683ADF5.9050901@corky.net> <1183075929.15488.148.camel@edge.yarra.acx> <4684A728.1050405@corky.net> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
> I run fsr all the time because in my case there is hundreds of gigs of > new data added to each file system every day, some of it does badly need > to be defragged as the files added are actively being served, not just It might be better to investigate why XFS does such a poor job for your workload in the first case. Unless the file systems are always nearly full or you have a lot of holes it shouldn't fragment that badly in the first place. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [linux-pm] Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc4 XFS fails after hibernate/resume, David Greaves |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc5 XFS fails after hibernate/resume, David Greaves |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs_fsr, performance related tweaks, Just Marc |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs_fsr, performance related tweaks, Just Marc |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |