| To: | Just Marc <marc@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs_fsr, performance related tweaks |
| From: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 29 Jun 2007 17:41:14 +1000 |
| Cc: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, Barry Naujok <bnaujok@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4684B1CC.60004@corky.net> |
| References: | <4683ADEB.3010106@corky.net> <46841C60.5030207@sandeen.net> <4684A506.4030705@corky.net> <op.tun7i8wd3jf8g2@pc-bnaujok.melbourne.sgi.com> <4684A98B.1030000@corky.net> <20070629070814.GR31489@sgi.com> <4684B1CC.60004@corky.net> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 08:16:28AM +0100, Just Marc wrote: > David, > > In my first post I already said something like that can be done but it's > just an ugly hack. Don't you think it would best be handled cleanly > and correctly by fsr itself? No, I don't - if you want files not to be defragmented, then you have to set the flags yourself in some way. You have a specific need that can be solved by some scripting to describe your defrag/no defrag policy. xfs_fsr has no place is setting defrag policy; it's function is simply to find and defrag files. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [linux-pm] Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc4 XFS fails after hibernate/resume, David Greaves |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [linux-pm] Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc4 XFS fails after hibernate/resume, David Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs_fsr, performance related tweaks, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs_fsr, performance related tweaks, Just Marc |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |