| To: | Szabolcs Illes <S.Illes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: After reboot fs with barrier faster deletes then fs with nobarrier |
| From: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 27 Jun 2007 14:45:06 -0700 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <op.tuldjrzef7nho5@sunset.cpc.wmin.ac.uk> |
| References: | <op.tuldjrzef7nho5@sunset.cpc.wmin.ac.uk> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 06:58:29PM +0100, Szabolcs Illes wrote:
> I repeated this test several times, same results. I made sure
> nothing was running while I was doing the tests, cpu was idle, hdd
> led was not on, etc.
instead of doing a reboot can you try something like:
echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
or
echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
(the value is a bit mask, bit 0 will drop the page cache, bit 1 will
drop the slab)
does that give you more or less the same results as rebooting?
another thing to try, before the delete, also try:
find path/to/whatever -noleaf >/dev/null
and see if that helps (i expect it should greatly)
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | After reboot fs with barrier faster deletes then fs with nobarrier, Szabolcs Illes |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: After reboot fs with barrier faster deletes then fs with nobarrier, Szabolcs Illes |
| Previous by Thread: | After reboot fs with barrier faster deletes then fs with nobarrier, Szabolcs Illes |
| Next by Thread: | Re: After reboot fs with barrier faster deletes then fs with nobarrier, Szabolcs Illes |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |