| To: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc4 XFS fails after hibernate/resume |
| From: | Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 27 Jun 2007 20:49:24 +0000 |
| Cc: | David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Robinson <zxvdr.au@xxxxxxxxx>, LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-pm <linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, LinuxRaid <linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20070618145007.GE85884050@sgi.com> |
| References: | <46744065.6060605@dgreaves.com> <4674645F.5000906@gmail.com> <46751D37.5020608@dgreaves.com> <4676390E.6010202@dgreaves.com> <20070618145007.GE85884050@sgi.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.9i |
Hi!
> FWIW, I'm on record stating that "sync" is not sufficient to quiesce an XFS
> filesystem for a suspend/resume to work safely and have argued that the only
Hmm, so XFS writes to disk even when its threads are frozen?
> safe thing to do is freeze the filesystem before suspend and thaw it after
> resume. This is why I originally asked you to test that with the other problem
Could you add that to the XFS threads if it is really required? They
do know that they are being frozen for suspend.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: After reboot fs with barrier faster deletes then fs with nobarrier, Szabolcs Illes |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 0/6][TAKE5] fallocate system call, Mingming Cao |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc5 XFS fails after hibernate/resume, David Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc4 XFS fails after hibernate/resume, Rafael J. Wysocki |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |