xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

PARTIAL TAKE 965537 - xfsprogs AC_TYPE_U32 broken by defining HAVE___U32

To: sgi.bugs.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: PARTIAL TAKE 965537 - xfsprogs AC_TYPE_U32 broken by defining HAVE___U32_T instead of HAVE___U32
From: tes@xxxxxxx (Tim Shimmin)
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 13:32:33 +1000 (EST)
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
s/HAVE___U32_T/HAVE___U32/g
Thanks to Eric Sandeen for finding this.

Date:  Fri Jun  1 13:31:17 AEST 2007
Workarea:  chook.melbourne.sgi.com:/build/tes/xfs-cmds
Inspected by:  sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx

The following file(s) were checked into:
  longdrop.melbourne.sgi.com:/isms/xfs-cmds/master-melb


Modid:  master-melb:xfs-cmds:28754a
xfsprogs/doc/CHANGES - 1.240 - changed
http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/xfs-cmds/xfsprogs/doc/CHANGES.diff?r1=text&tr1=1.240&r2=text&tr2=1.239&f=h
xfsprogs/aclocal.m4 - 1.26 - changed
http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/xfs-cmds/xfsprogs/aclocal.m4.diff?r1=text&tr1=1.26&r2=text&tr2=1.25&f=h
xfsprogs/m4/package_types.m4 - 1.4 - changed
http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/xfs-cmds/xfsprogs/m4/package_types.m4.diff?r1=text&tr1=1.4&r2=text&tr2=1.3&f=h
        - s/HAVE___U32_T/HAVE___U32/g
          Thanks to Eric Sandeen for finding this.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • PARTIAL TAKE 965537 - xfsprogs AC_TYPE_U32 broken by defining HAVE___U32_T instead of HAVE___U32, Tim Shimmin <=