| To: | David Chatterton <dchatterton@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Review: Concurrent Multi-File Data Streams |
| From: | Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 15 May 2007 00:39:46 +0200 |
| Cc: | "'Andi Kleen'" <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'xfs-dev'" <xfs-dev@xxxxxxx>, "'xfs-oss'" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'David Chinner'" <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <000001c79544$44076ac0$0501010a@DCHATTERTONLAPTOP> |
| References: | <p73sla1ev7o.fsf@bingen.suse.de> <000001c79544$44076ac0$0501010a@DCHATTERTONLAPTOP> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
> So yes this is designed for a workload where the number of AGs is a multiple > of the number of streams since mixing streams in the one AG is the problem > it tries to avoid. Sounds like a awful special case. Is that common? -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 2.6.21-git10/11: files getting truncated on xfs? or maybe an nlink problem?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Review: Concurrent Multi-File Data Streams, David Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Review: Concurrent Multi-File Data Streams - centisecs, Timothy Shimmin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Review: Concurrent Multi-File Data Streams, David Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |