Re: [PATCH 1/5] fallocate() implementation in i86, x86_64 and powerpc

[Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 08:50:44PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Suparna Bhattacharya writes:
> 
> > > This looks like it will have the same problem on s390 as
> > > sys_sync_file_range.  Maybe the prototype should be:
> > > 
> > > asmlinkage long sys_fallocate(loff_t offset, loff_t len, int fd, int mode)
> > 
> > Yes, but the trouble is that there was a contrary viewpoint preferring that 
> > fd
> > first be maintained as a convention like other syscalls (see the following
> > posts)
> 
> Of course the interface used by an application program would have the
> fd first.  Glibc can do the translation.

I think that was understood.

Regards
Suparna

> 
> Paul.

-- 
Suparna Bhattacharya (suparna@xxxxxxxxxx)
Linux Technology Center
IBM Software Lab, India