| To: | Stephen So <s.so@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Slow performance when extracting tarballs |
| From: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:35:38 -0700 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4635DAA4.4070402@griffith.edu.au> |
| References: | <4635DAA4.4070402@griffith.edu.au> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 10:01:40PM +1000, Stephen So wrote: > After looking at top during the extraction process, bzip2 uses about > 80-90% of CPU initially and extraction seems quite fast but after a > few seconds, it drops to 30-40%, the system becomes non responsive, > and extraction is much slower. what does "vmstat 1" look like during this? > noatime, nodiratime, logbufs=8 have you also tried setting (increasing) logbsize? (i think you need v2 logs to make that work) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Slow performance when extracting tarballs, Stephen So |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC] add FIEMAP ioctl to efficiently map file allocation, Andreas Dilger |
| Previous by Thread: | Slow performance when extracting tarballs, Stephen So |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Slow performance when extracting tarballs, David Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |