xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: xfs_ncheck (actually xfs_db) eats a lot of memory and is killed

To: "'Marcin Zajączkowski'" <mszpak@xxxxx>, <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: xfs_ncheck (actually xfs_db) eats a lot of memory and is killed
From: "Barry Naujok" <bnaujok@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 10:54:49 +1100
In-reply-to: <em5il9$tge$1@sea.gmane.org>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AccifOn4OcIjD1s9SIKDFJ/LPnHzrwAfjWOQ
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
> On Behalf Of Marcin Zajaczkowski
> Sent: Monday, 18 December 2006 7:15 PM
> To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: xfs_ncheck (actually xfs_db) eats a lot of 
> memory and is killed
> 
> Barry Naujok wrote:
> >> Btw, xfs_check shows two lines:
> >> link count mismatch for inode 1572882 (name ?), nlink 16, 
> counted 15
> >> link count mismatch for inode 2102297 (name ?), nlink 2, counted 3
> >> Can it be reason for strange xfs_db behavior?
> > 
> > No, this shouldn't be causing the xfs_db strange behaviour, but the
> > nlink count mismatch is a problem with xfs_repair 2.8.11. 
> Try and use
> > xfs_repair 2.8.16 and later to fix this issue. Older versions before
> > 2.8.11 will also fix the nlink issue.
> 
> I have some old system rescue CD with xfs_progs from line 
> 2.7.x. Would 
> it be ok?

Yes, that should be fine AFAIK.

Barry.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>