| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | mkfs.xfs questions |
| From: | Jasmin Buchert <jasmin@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 29 Nov 2006 17:45:53 +0100 |
| Domainkey-status: | no signature |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hi, I'm planning to use XFS but have some questions.. Is there any real advantage of making the log size 32-64 MB and what is the difference between log version 1 and 2 regarding to efficency/performance? Is it true that a small agcount is better for most systems (Gentoo and some other sources recommend this)? It's a desktop machine. Greetings, Jasmin Buchert |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] fix sparse warning in xfs_da_btree.c, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/2]segmentation fault in xfs_io mread/mwrite command, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] fix sparse warning in xfs_da_btree.c, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: mkfs.xfs questions, Christian Kujau |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |