xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: xfs_repair said "cache_purge: shake on cache 0x80f5288 left 1inodes!

To: "'Håkan Lindqvist'" <lindqvist@xxxxxxxxxx>, <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: xfs_repair said "cache_purge: shake on cache 0x80f5288 left 1inodes!?"
From: "Barry Naujok" <bnaujok@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 10:54:24 +1000
In-reply-to: <1159458565.28220.12.camel@lasse>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcbjIK0l+VsNXr65TtW50EjcCbwHkAAQL21w
Hi, 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
> On Behalf Of Håkan Lindqvist
> Sent: Friday, 29 September 2006 1:49 AM
> To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: xfs_repair said "cache_purge: shake on cache 
> 0x80f5288 left 1inodes!?"
> 
> Hi!
> 
> When I ran xfs_repair (2.8.11) to fix a filesystem that had 
> been bitten
> by the Linux 2.6.17.<7 bug the following happened:
> 
> All seemed to go well, xfs_repair found the problematic 
> directory inode
> and rebuilded it.
> 
> At the end (right before printing "done"), it did however say
> "cache_purge: shake on cache 0x80f5288 left 1 inodes!?" thrice.
> 
> The filesystem appears to be fine so far (and the directory that
> previously caused the filesystem to shut down is ok again), but that
> error/warning message sounded a little scary.
> 
> Is this problem harmless or should I be worried?

This cache_purge comment is harmless. It's informing us that some buffers
have reference counts remaining that weren't unreferenced when read. All
dirty buffers do get written.

Barry.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>