xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: FAQ updated (was Re: XFS breakage...)

To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: FAQ updated (was Re: XFS breakage...)
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 08:52:30 +1000
Cc: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>, David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kasper Sandberg <lkml@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Torsten Landschoff <torsten@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, ml@xxxxxxxx, radsaq@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607201843020.2619@p34.internal.lan>; from jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com on Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 06:43:34PM -0400
References: <20060718222941.GA3801@stargate.galaxy> <20060719085731.C1935136@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <1153304468.3706.4.camel@localhost> <20060720171310.B1970528@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <44BF8500.1010708@dgreaves.com> <20060720161121.GA26748@tuatara.stupidest.org> <20060721081452.B1990742@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607201817450.23697@p34.internal.lan> <20060721082448.C1990742@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607201843020.2619@p34.internal.lan>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 06:43:34PM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> p34:~# xfs_check -v /dev/md3
> xfs_check: out of memory
> p34:~#
> 
> D'oh...

xfs_repair -n is another option, it has a cheaper (memory wise,
usually) checking algorithm.

> As long as it mounted ok with the patched kernel, should one be ok?

Not necessarily, no - mount will only read the root inode.

cheers.

-- 
Nathan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>