| To: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: TAKE 949916 - direct read vs delalloc |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 17 Mar 2006 17:57:19 +0000 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20060317053019.C44EF49F168A@chook.melbourne.sgi.com> |
| References: | <20060317053019.C44EF49F168A@chook.melbourne.sgi.com> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 04:30:19PM +1100, Nathan Scott wrote: > Flush and invalidate dirty pages at the start of a direct read also, > else we can hit a delalloc-extents-via-direct-io BUG. If this is needed it should be done in the filemap.c code. > > Date: Fri Mar 17 16:29:59 AEDT 2006 > Workarea: chook.melbourne.sgi.com:/build/nathans/xfs-linux > Inspected by: tes > > The following file(s) were checked into: > longdrop.melbourne.sgi.com:/isms/xfs-kern/xfs-linux-melb > > > Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:25483a > linux-2.6/xfs_lrw.c - 1.237 - changed http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/xfs-linux/> linux-2.6/xfs_lrw.c.diff?r1=text&tr1=1.237&r2=text&tr2=1.236&f=h > http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/xfs-linux/linux-2.6/xfs_lrw.c.diff?r1=text&tr1=1.237&r2=text&tr2=1.236&f=h > > ---end quoted text--- |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC] Badness in __mutex_unlock_slowpath with XFS stress tests, Adrian Bunk |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: TAKE 949916 - direct read vs delalloc, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | TAKE 949916 - direct read vs delalloc, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: TAKE 949916 - direct read vs delalloc, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |