| To: | Simon Munton <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Patch to fix segmentation fault in libattr |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 22 Feb 2006 13:08:47 +1100 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200602212219.59512.simon@munton.demon.co.uk>; from simon@munton.demon.co.uk on Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 10:19:59PM +0000 |
| References: | <200602212219.59512.simon@munton.demon.co.uk> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 10:19:59PM +0000, Simon Munton wrote: > Hi > > I found that using the attr command with the -l option could cause a > segmentation fault. > > I tracked the problem down to the attr_list function in libattr.c. This > contains a loop that uses the value from the listxattr call to determine when > the loop finishes. However, this value is overwritten in the loop by the call > to getxattr. Good catch, thanks! I'll get that fixed up (tend to agree with Chris re shadow variables - so I'll make it clear with separate ones). cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Patch to fix segmentation fault in libattr, Chris Wedgwood |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE 907752 - attr, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Patch to fix segmentation fault in libattr, Chris Wedgwood |
| Next by Thread: | TAKE 907752 - attr, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |