xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

TAKE 949214 - utimes vs atime

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, sgi.bugs.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: TAKE 949214 - utimes vs atime
From: nathans@xxxxxxx (Nathan Scott)
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 18:13:55 +1100 (EST)
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Fix missing inode atime update from the utime syscall.

Date:  Tue Feb  7 18:13:33 AEDT 2006
Workarea:  chook.melbourne.sgi.com:/build/nathans/xfs-linux
Inspected by:  dgc,tes

The following file(s) were checked into:
  longdrop.melbourne.sgi.com:/isms/xfs-kern/xfs-linux-melb


Modid:  xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:25136a
linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c - 1.239 - changed
http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/xfs-linux/linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c.diff?r1=text&tr1=1.239&r2=text&tr2=1.238&f=h
linux-2.4/xfs_iops.c - 1.219 - changed
http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/xfs-linux/linux-2.4/xfs_iops.c.diff?r1=text&tr1=1.219&r2=text&tr2=1.218&f=h


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • TAKE 949214 - utimes vs atime, Nathan Scott <=