| To: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS unhappy with large holey loopback and syncs |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 30 Nov 2005 03:17:01 +0100 |
| Cc: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20051130015959.GC19154461@melbourne.sgi.com> |
| References: | <20051129003611.GF7209@brahms.suse.de> <20051130015959.GC19154461@melbourne.sgi.com> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> You need at least 23GiB of disk space for the test to run. Given the > filesytem i tested on was ~8.5TB, I guess I wouldn't have seen this. Hmm, the fs was indeed smaller. That would probably explain it right. I wouldn't have expected that it needed that much data. > I can't test this on ext3 or reiserfs because they don't appear to support > sparse > files larger than the filesytem itself. JFS does. > > I'd try running this on a larger XFS filesystem (e.g. 30GB) and see if the > problem goes away. Will do later thanks. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS unhappy with large holey loopback and syncs, David Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE 912426 - disable barriers by default, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS unhappy with large holey loopback and syncs, David Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(2), Gaspar Bakos |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |