Nathan Scott [nathans@xxxxxxx] wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 10:08:20AM +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > You could also try to drop the XFS (fs/xfs) code from 2.6.14 into
> > 2.6.15-rc2 and see if your problem persists. There isn't anything
> > I can see from scanning though everything we committed into .15 so
> > far that would explain this. Oh, an easier test you could do would
> > be to try XFS CVS from oss.sgi.com - that has 2.6.14 + all the XFS
> > changes since then, so that should confirm/deny an XFS regression
> > too. Thanks!
>
> Also, could you send me the .config file you're using please?
>
> thanks.
>
> --
> Nathan
I can conferm the same behavior in the cvs version, as of this morning.
--
*--* Mail: lawrence@xxxxxxxx
*--* Voice: 425.739.4247
*--* Fax: 425.827.9577
*--* HTTP://the-penguin.otak.com/~lawrence
--------------------------------------
- - - - - - O t a k i n c . - - - - -
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
|