| To: | Al Boldi <a1426z@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Good, recent FS comparison? |
| From: | Jamie Lokier <jamie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:37:03 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Linux RAID Mailing List <linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200509162258.37730.a1426z@gawab.com> |
| References: | <6d5bedd8050915131148b8108a@mail.gmail.com> <432A37BF.7060305@dtbb.net> <200509162258.37730.a1426z@gawab.com> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
Al Boldi wrote: > ext3 is rock-solid! If only. Recently I had a system come up after a power cycle with a directory where reading any file in that directory gives an I/O error. The disk is fine, and it's using ext3 in ordered mode, with IDE write-caching disabled to be sure. So while ext3 is good, I'm not convinced it's rock solid. -- Jamie |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs 1.2 can't mount my promise sata raid filesystem- Plesae help, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Good, recent FS comparison?, Al Boldi |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Good, recent FS comparison?, George N. White III |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Good, recent FS comparison?, Al Boldi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |