| To: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Speed up xfsdump ? - threading |
| From: | Tim Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 15 Sep 2005 16:33:07 +1000 |
| Cc: | Bill Kendall <wkendall@xxxxxxx>, Nicolas Kowalski <Nicolas.Kowalski@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <p73zmqgjfgn.fsf@verdi.suse.de>; from ak@suse.de on Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 09:06:32AM +0200 |
| References: | <4325BA69.4070709@sgi.com> <20050912174223.51325.qmail@web34104.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20050913123852.Z4874818@boing.melbourne.sgi.com> <p73zmqgjfgn.fsf@verdi.suse.de> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
Hi Andi, On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 09:06:32AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > Tim Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx> writes: > > is not needed. > > Unfortunately AFAIK, the threaded part of xfsdump on Linux is > > not there (it is on IRIX with sprocs). > > I remember looking at the code some time ago. It shouldn't > be that hard to port to pthreads shouldn't it? > > Any specific reason that hasn't been done yet? > Sorry, I never looked into it and the person who did look into the work/issues involved, at the time we did the port, is on holiday. Since the port I believe it's been revisited but I'm not working on dump anymore, so I can't say :) (Sorry for the non-answer;-) --Tim |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs: Cannot establish any listening sockets, Jan M |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE 942609 - only mark buffers done when all pages are uptodate, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Speed up xfsdump ?, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Speed up xfsdump ?, Nicolas Kowalski |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |