| To: | Jan Derfinak <ja@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Corruption of in-memory data detected. |
| From: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 10 Sep 2005 17:55:30 -0700 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.58.0509102350310.18556@alienAngel.home.sk> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.58.0509082156530.9425@alienAngel.home.sk> <4321CDDD.8010607@gmx.net> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0509092130160.8548@alienAngel.home.sk> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0509102350310.18556@alienAngel.home.sk> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 11:58:24PM +0200, Jan Derfinak wrote: > How safe is 'noikeep' options? Can it be cause of instability? I've used it on multiple machines with multiple filesystems each for a long time now (basically since it first appeared). |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Corruption of in-memory data detected., Jan Derfinak |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Speed up xfsdump ?, Nicolas Kowalski |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Corruption of in-memory data detected., Jan Derfinak |
| Next by Thread: | Speed up xfsdump ?, Nicolas Kowalski |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |