| To: | evilninja <evilninja@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS repair problem |
| From: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 9 Aug 2005 07:48:59 +1000 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, djani22@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <42F798AF.5080505@gmx.net>; from evilninja@gmx.net on Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 07:38:55PM +0200 |
| References: | <001001c59bfb$1fe7aae0$0400a8c0@LocalHost> <42F74B6D.8060002@gmx.net> <00d801c59c20$e0354080$0400a8c0@LocalHost> <42F798AF.5080505@gmx.net> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 07:38:55PM +0200, evilninja wrote: > djani22@xxxxxxxxxxxxx schrieb: > > > Max 945MB > > top line: > > 17595 root 18 0 945M 941M 764 R 31.4 23.2 0:44 3 xfs_repair > > maybe the xfs-gurus on this list can comment on that? is this normal? For large filesystems with lots of files in them, yes. It is not unusual to see xfs_repair consume multiple gigabytes of memory in this situation. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner R&D Software Enginner SGI Australian Software Group |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS repair problem, evilninja |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS repair problem, David Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS repair problem, evilninja |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS repair problem, David Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |