| To: | "'Christoph Hellwig'" <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: TAKE 934766 - Delay direct I/O completion to a workqueue |
| From: | "Al Boldi" <a1426z@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 6 Aug 2005 04:13:06 +0300 |
| Cc: | <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20050805090820.GA6925@infradead.org> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | AcWaNl2mC1eoh8ZxTFG/7FR/mklGMAAE5OqQ |
Christoph Hellwig wrote: {
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 05:31:58PM +0300, Al Boldi wrote:
> Will this affect XFS behaviour with regards to the non-existent
> Ordered-Mode?
No.
}
Is there a way to coax XFS into doing something like ordered mode?
I remember that this ordered-mode behaviour was available before XFS was
added into the vanilla-Kernel!
--
Al
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: TAKE 934766 - Delay direct I/O completion to a workqueue, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | sdx problems, Laszlo Boszormenyi |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: TAKE 934766 - Delay direct I/O completion to a workqueue, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: TAKE 934766 - Delay direct I/O completion to a workqueue, Stephen Lord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |